Archive for April, 2009

No Disc Golf in Leddy

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

This is a letter in opposition to the proposed disc golf course in Leddy Park.  I was scheduled to speak at the public meeting, but could not stay due to childcare responsibilities.  My name is Maeve Cohen.  I have lived on Fern Street which borders the park, for the past year, and have been a Burlington resident for 16 years.  I walk through the Leddy Park woods to the beach on a daily basis.  Prior to that I lived in the South End of Burlington and have been traveling to Leddy Park many years.  While I am now a direct neighbor of this park, I had just as much interest and concern for protection of this small slice of urban woodland while living elsewhere in Burlington.  The people in opposition to disc golf in the woods have been characterized as just a group of neighbors near the park, and that is not true.  This jewel of a park belongs to everyone in Burlington.

In making this decision about disc golf it is extremely important to consider how this area of the city has grown since Leddy Park was loosely classified as recreational space.  I met a business owner in the North Avenue plaza who grew up on Gosse Court, the very street where the Miller Center is now.  When she was raised on Gosse Court there were only two houses on the street and it was actually still a dirt road.  All along that street were woods where she played.  This is not a deceased ancestor.  This is a woman still alive and working, so the changes to the New North End in terms of open space have happened in a very short time. Today the entire New North End is similar to Gosse Court in that it is a rather monotonous collection of straight streets with little ranch houses built by the same developer.  One house after another, one street after another.  Now that children and adults no longer have pockets of forest next to their homes anywhere in this suburban stretch, the Leddy Park woods are absolutely invaluable.  Leddy is very much woven into the fabric of this neighborhood and this city as a place of respite and enjoyment which is by no means unused.  The land must be carefully considered in the context of what we have left for open space now as opposed to when the city first acquired the park.

This decision also requires the important definition of what constitutes “recreation”. The woman on the working group who raised the issue of defining what recreation means was speaking to the real heart of this matter.  There are already several forms of competitive sports going on in Leddy Park.  These activities are done mainly by children and young men.  There is also walking and other forms of exercise done on the wooded trails, along with learning, observing nature, and just plain decompressing that is made possible by access to these rare beautiful woods by the lake.  These activities seem to be done mostly by mothers with young children and middle-age/older men and women.   Elders tend to get their exercise by walking, and many express a deep enjoyment of walking in nature.  I would hope that this form of recreation is not to be discounted by Parks and Rec.  Are elders and others who don’t do organized sports less entitled to use these woods for their form of recreation?  When I walk in the woods I am “active”.  This IS recreational use of this park. Because an activity is not competitive does not mean that it should be labeled as “passive”.  ‘Passive recreation” is an outdated term for describing recreation and I believe activities should be defined as competitive or non-competitive.

If the City council truly is committed to the Burlington Livable Community Project which is looking to improve life for the future demographic changes which are coming to this city, then the prospect of a relatively small sporting group altering a priceless natural park is a very, very big issue.  In the future demographic shift which is already occurring this park would be used by an even larger population of seniors.  The Burlington Livable Community Project can be researched on the web.  It’s very much related to this debate in Leddy Park.  While at the public meeting the other night, I was surrounded on all sides by proponents of disc golf.  As the elder women spoke of  birds, animals, quietude, these people sat snickering and making audible mocking comments.  This repulsed me, and I couldn’t help but think, “Is this the kind of person we want more of in the woods of Leddy Park???”  Do I want to walk in the woods near people who make snide remarks about grandmothers who grew up with this park?  Is this the kind of integrity that makes Burlington the caring city that it is?”  Certainly not.  I venture to guess it could have been the same people who stole all the yellow signs directing people to the meeting.

I myself am not a senior citizen, just someone who has not lost a connection with nature.  I am raising two children and have spent much time with my family in Leddy Park.  There is a palpable sense of wonder when we enter the woods from the neighborhood.  My toddler always wants to get out of the stroller and discover a different world.  He says with awe, “We’re in the WOODS now!”  And he asks about how the tree fell over, or why those mushrooms grow on the branches, or what was that bird saying?”  How can it be described to people who see a forest as a place to be trampled for yet more organized sporting… how can it be described that it is of incredible value to be able to show our children a world other than a plastic sterile playground with uniform wood chips, noise and car exhaust in the air?

When my oldest son was small we lived in downtown Burlington and as a single parent I did not have a car.  I used to take him on the bus out here to Leddy Park frequently to explore the woods and enjoy the beach.  Not everyone in this town has cars as most of the disc golfers do.  Not everyone in this city is able to take their children out of town to the country for a river swim, to the mountains for skiing, to Florida in winter for vacation.  I think it’s safe to say that most of the college students around Burlington and others who play disc golf have the ability to do those things.  But Leddy Park belongs to ALL of the residents in this city.  Leddy, in its present state is an invaluable piece of beauty for everyone, including those with no cars and little money to take their kids to experience nature outside of town.  It’s on a bus route.  I used it all the time.  My children benefitted immensely from these outings we called little vacations.  Now I am lucky enough to live right next to this gem of a park which currently offers a perfect balance of recreation for those who like competitive organized sports, as well for those who like walking, observing wildlife, breathing fresh air, and swimming at an uncrowded beach.

Lastly, my biggest concern of all is one which no one has mentioned yet, and that is the beach itself.  I go to Leddy Beach every single day during the warm months, whether it is on my morning walk, or to bring my kids for a swim.  I choose to go to Leddy over other beaches precisely because of the character of this beach.  It does not have large groups of people drinking alcohol, smoking, playing loud music, and making vociferous comments about women as they walk by.   There are no lifeguards, no whistles blowing, and people are free to just have a calm day in a beautiful place.   In short, Leddy Beach does not have these negative things which I’m certain would change if large groups were coming down to the beach after their games and tournaments.  I go to Leddy Beach because it is an amazing, pristine, peaceful and safe place to enjoy the lake.  Everyone is there because they truly appreciate the location and they want to be there, and not as a place to drink some beer and hang out with a crowd after a game. If disc golf were allowed into the woods, then this beloved beach would change drastically.   People have talked of the pollution of the lake with the increased run-off of car oil in the parking lot.  What about the immediate beach water?  What would become of the clear water with a parking lot full of cars?

I am kept awake at night with the prospect of this unthinkable mistake happening to Leddy Beach and Park.  I urge the decision-makers not to allow disc golf to go into Leddy Park and destroy the walking paths and beach which are absolute treasures to the residents of Burlington.  I for one, would no longer take my two-year-old walking in the woods with discs flying.  We would be unable to use that precious sanctuary that I have enjoyed for 16 years, and some seniors have cherished their whole lives.  Having access to nature is every bit as important to a healthy city as adding another competitive sport for a relative few.  I think that disc golf is a fine activity in an appropriate place.  It should not under any circumstances, be located in Leddy Park.

Sincerely,
Maeve Cohen

Fewer than 1% Play Disc Golf

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Within the next few months the Burlington City Council will likely vote on a measure that is the de facto equivalent of blocking 99% of its residents from using 90% of one of its city parks. That measure is whether Leddy Park’s wooded areas should be turned into an 18 hole Disk Golf Course. Yes, the City will retain technical ownership of the entire park. But …

Imagine yourself as being a non-golfer as you walk the fairways of an in-use regular golf course. Would you feel welcome? Of course not. Unkind words would surely fly, and I would expect fists would occasionally fly too. The same will be true of Disk Golf at Leddy park. If only 1% of Burlington’s residents play disk golf, the other 99% will be unwelcome to use a huge percentage of Leddy Park , an area that is now quiet and tranquil woods with walking trails with wonderful wildlife viewing opportunities. Substantial tree cutting has already happened in anticipation of approval. Let the City Council know how you feel. Better yet, attend their meetings. The park is for everyone, not just the probably fewer than 1 percent of residents that play Disk Golf.

Peter Larsen

Disc Golf Safety at Leddy Park

Sunday, April 12th, 2009

Originally Presented to Disc Golf Working Group by Ron McGarvey

There are no published statistics on disc golf injuries; however, it only takes about 30 minutes of looking on the Internet to locate newspaper articles, research papers, comments and blogs that identify numerous instances of by-standers or non-players being injured by thrown discs.  Attached to this  statement are copies of articles, websites, URL’s, etc.  that identify a sample of these incidents.  From these sources it is very apparent that bystanders, non-participants and other park users have been subjected to very serious injuries,e.g. broken bones, damaged teeth and lacerations that have required stitches.  It doesn’t appear that these types of injuries are common, but they do occur, especially in multi-use parks or where disc golf courses are located close to  places where people walk and/or ride bikes. These articles also identify more than one case where disc golf courses have been relocated in order to protect non-participants and to reduce the liability exposure of the entity sponsoring the disc golf course.

#1  Disc Golf in multi-use parks can cause serious injuries to non-players

This brings me to the issues of course design, setbacks from adjacent property and buffer zones between course fairways and walking/bike path for the course proposed at Leddy.  At the Sept 3d public meeting it was reported that the proposed course has been designed to allow for 75 foot setbacks from property lines and 25 foot buffer zones from walking and bike paths-including the Burlington Bike Path.  A review of the course design standards at the Professional Disc Golf Association’s  (PDGA) website (http://www.pdga.com/course-development) shows very detailed and specific information about things such as tee to hole distance,  type of  terrain, density of trees/vegetation, etc.  for determining the par for individual holes and the difficulty level of the course.  The standards, however, do not provide similarly detailed information to ensure the safety of non-players.  Rather, there are general statements to be aware of other park users when designing a new course, but there is no specific information about minimum distances for setbacks and buffer zones from other park uses to ensure the safety of non-participants.  From the perspective of corporate liability,  I can understand why the Professional Disc Golf Association does not provide specific information about how to ensure the safety of non-players.  Given this lack of prescriptive standards  to ensure the safety of non-players, the proposed 75 foot setbacks from property lines and 25 foot buffer zones between fairways and existing paths and other Park activities, appear to be arbitrary or subjective values developed to fit the proposed course within the available space, rather than to ensure the safety of other Park users.

#2  The Professional Disc Golf Association’s Standards for course design do not provide specific information or requirements to ensure the safety of non-players

Given that disc golf can be hazardous to non-players and that the PDGA course design standards do not provide any specific standards for ensuring the safety of non-players, it is essential that the Working Group make recommendations to the Parks and Recreation Commission about changes to the course design that will reduce the potential for injuries to non-players and also reduce the City’s exposure to liability claims.  At a minimum the Working Group should recommend that property setbacks and buffer zones between fairways and walking paths be increased to at least 150 feet and 75 feet respectively, with additional distance where vegetation is thin.  Or, as suggested by some disc golfers on the PDGA’s Discussion website, http://discussion.pdga.com/msgboard/postlist.php?Cat=0&Board=CourseDesign, recommend that the disc golf course be located in a disc golf-only location.
#3  The Working Group should recommend that  the property setback and buffer zones distances at Leddy be increased, or locate the course in a disc-golf only location.

For Attachments to this Statement Recounting Disc Golf Injuries and Safety Risks Click Here