Archive for February, 2009

Candidates Say No To Disc Golf

Sunday, February 22nd, 2009

Three out of the Four mayoral candidates are against bulding a disc golf course in Leddy Park.

Kurt Wright – NO
Andy Montroll – NO
Bob Kiss – NO

Note:  When the question was asked at the Seven Days Forum, it was phrased differently at first — 18 hole disc golf course in NNE? This led Dan Smith to say YES, and Kurt Wright to answer UNCERTAIN. When “as proposed” and “Leddy Park” were added to the question, Andy Montroll and Bob Kiss said NO.  Kurt Wright recently clarified his position – against disc golf at Leddy Park.

At the recent NPA forum, both Ward 4 City Council Candidates stated their opposition to the disc golf course proposal.

Ellie Kenworthy – NO
Nancy Kaplan – NO

Friends of Leddy Park Letter to Commission

Friday, February 20th, 2009

February 19, 2009

Dear Burlington Parks and Recreation Commission,

My name is Nancy Powers I am the Co-Chair of the Friends of Leddy Park that is currently a group of about 35 active residents who volunteer their time and talents to support Leddy Park.

I am here this evening for two reasons. One to share some of the things Friends of Leddy Park have done for this Park and to ask for your support and continued endorsement of our efforts. The second part of my presentation is to understand your perspective related to some of the historical documents, we have researched, and ask questions related to these findings.

First, as you know from my last presentation October 9, 2008 we have been having regular meetings and have had the support of Lisa Coven (Land Steward). In November we organized a park clean-up day, for which Lisa provided trash bags and tools. We had 13 volunteers on a rainy November Saturday pick up 14 bags of trash and improve the safety of one of the park’s walking trails. In January we arranged for Park Historian Muriel More to make a presentation to the Wards 4 and 7 NPA about the development of Burlington’s Parks and the city’s acquisition of Leddy Park. We have also initiated a “Did You Know…” flyer to share information about the park and as a way for park users to share their observations and “discoveries” of interesting things about Leddy Park.

Going forward,
1) We are working on a proposal to reduce the amount of pet waste and to have consistent receptacles for trash in the park.
2) We will continue to do seasonal clean-ups of the natural areas of the park and trail maintenance.
3) We are working on identifying and the removal of invasive species that will enhance the natural vegetation and wildlife habitat of the park.
4) We look forward to exploring ways that Leddy can be better utilized as an educational resource.

We ask for your support and endorsement to continue our efforts and for the Parks and Recreation Department to continue to enable Lisa Coven to be our liaison and support.

The second reason I have come to you is to discuss some of the foundation documents for Burlington City land (including Leddy Park) that were discovered in our history search.

We’ve reviewed some of the City’s documents that describe the purchase and vision for Leddy Park and Burlington’s future vision of urban city parks. Specifically, we’ve viewed the November 1970, ”Findings of Fact and Order”, History of Burlington Book, “Oct 2000 Open Space Protection Plan”, the “2006 Municipal Development Plan” and the “Urban Forest Master Plan”.

 The “2006 Municipal Development Plan”, which incorporates all of the “Open Space Protection Plan”, and by state statute is the principal guide directing land use policy and decision-making, identifies Leddy Park as part of Burlington’s urban forest.

Section II-1 of the Municipal Development Plan-Vision Statement- City Policies goals include:

1) Protect and preserve natural areas and open spaces of local, regional and statewide significance for the benefit of future generations.

2) Maintain and improve the integrity of natural and recreational systems within the City.

3) Guide development into the city center and neighborhood activity centers.

4) Ensure long-term stewardship and appropriate public access to natural areas and open space, including improved opportunities for pedestrian access and interaction throughout the City.

Section of VII -11 of the Municipal Development Plan mandates the protection of urban forests and specifically mentions Leddy Park in the context of urban forests. It says ” Burlington’s urban forest is much more than street trees, and also includes public trees and forests in parks, cemeteries, schools and other public land, and trees on private land in yards, open space and edges of developed areas. Examples include forest communities such as Ethan Allen Park, Leddy Park, Arms Grant Park, Intervale properties, and WVPD.

Appendix 1 of the “Open Space Protection Plan”, is the land inventory, which lists the following characteristics and attributes for Leddy Park:
Zoning: RCO (Recreation, Conservation, Open Space)
Ownership: Public (City Park)
Notes: significant wooded area
Attributes:

  • Natural Values: shorelines, wetlands, buffer and potential restoration
    Scenic Values: view points
  • Recreational & Educational Values: public park, trails, passive rec. value
  • Other Urban Open Space Values: access/connectors, parking/vacant lots

As you can see, the characteristics and attributes of Leddy Park identify it as an important natural area.

The glossary of Burlington’s Municipal Plan, defines Passive Recreation as activities such as sitting, walking, and nature watching and general relaxation. In contrast to “active recreation” that involves dedicated and organized recreational activities such as baseball, soccer, tennis, hockey, etc.

The city of Burlington should be commended for formally recognizing the value of open space preservation, for recognizing Leddy Park’s open space characteristics, and for its conservation efforts thus far in the park. We support the vision of keeping Leddy Parks urban forest a vital part of our community for passive recreation. Because of this effort we have created a mission statement for Friends of Leddy Park.

To encourage passive recreation use of the urban forest in Bernard Leddy Park; to help protect its flora, fauna, views, shoreline and the water quality of Lake Champlain; to act as stewards of the Park; and, to support the City of Burlington towards these ends.

Friends of Leddy Park would like to encourage discussion with you of the Municipal Development Plan, Open Space Protection Plan and the Forestry Plan in relation to Leddy Park. We look forward to working with you to preserve the health of the forest, including the under story, in this great park.

Please contact me with any questions,

Nancy Powers

Ward 4 & 7 NPA Resolution

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

DISC GOLF RESOLUTION

Presented by Wards 4 & 7 NPAs

(To be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Disc Golf Working Group)

~ Whereas the Parks and Recreation Commission has appointed a Disc Golf Working Group to evaluate the proposal for an 18-hole disc golf course at Leddy Park;

~ Whereas the Disc Golf Working Group has been charged to obtain input from the constituents who they represent;

~ Whereas the Chittenden County Forester, in a letter, dated September 22, 2008, stated, “…it would be hard to make a case that clearing the understory for disc golf (in Leddy Park) is consistent with maintaining long-term forest health or with the existing forest management plan.”;

Now, therefore, be it resolved that:

The residents of Wards 4 and 7, as represented by their NPAs, are not supportive of a disc golf course in Leddy Park due its adverse environmental impacts; and

The Disc Golf Working Group shall include this Resolution within the recommendations it makes to the Parks and Recreation Commission; and

The Parks and Recreation Commission shall direct the staff of the Parks and Recreation Department to work with the BTown Disc Golf Club to identify alternative sites for a disc golf course in Burlington, or surrounding communities.


The resolution concerning Disk Golf was proposed by Nancy Powers and seconded by Michael Crane from Ward 4; proposed by Greg Jenkins and seconded by Phil Lavigne from Ward 7.

The vote result:

Ward 4

support the Resolution 42

oppose the Resolution 0

uncertain 12

Ward 7

support the Resolution 14

oppose the Resolution 0

uncertain 9

More On Disc Golf

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

MORE ON DISC GOLF
By Roger & Sue Anderson, Caroline St., firesweep@verizon.net
Thu, 19 February 2009

On the subject of disc golf in Leddy Park, we happened to visit a park where disc golf was played last May while visiting our daughter and son-in-law out in Iowa City at law school there. They lived right in the city and we decided to seek quiet green place to take a walk. At a park about 10 minutes outside town, we instead found a place where the formerly semi-wild forest with it’s serene walking trails had been  partially converted into a disc golf course, an environment much like a regular golf course: a sterile grassy lawn mono-culture with isolated trees, heavily mowed and manicured, sporadic metal structures used as “pins” and, judging by the obvious heavy wear, well used. It was busy that evening with numerous small groups making a fair amount of noise. After walking about a bit, we left, disappointed. What a shame if the same fate were to befall our lovely Leddy Park. Disc golf belongs, but only in an appropriate location, certainly not in Leddy Park.
Roger & Susan Anderson
Caroline St.

Leddy Park Wrong for Disc Golf

Saturday, February 14th, 2009

Reprinted from Burlington Free Press 2/14 Editorial

Many city residents enjoy Leddy Park’s vibrant wooded areas and the network of trails threaded through this peaceful natural setting.   The quiet tranquil character of this undeveloped open space in the north end of Burlington has been host to walking, running, bird watching, and other passive recreational pursuits for over 30 years.  The increasingly scarce natural open space land within our city, and exemplified in the Leddy Park woodlands, should be preserved and protected.

Luckily our city has embraced the idea of open space preservation and eight years ago created a ninety three page document titled City of Burlington, VT Open Space Protection Plan which talks about the importance of open space conservation in making Burlington a more sustainable and livable city. Further, the plan describes exactly what should be protected and why. The Burlington City Council adopted the plan and its goals are widely supported by city residents.  Leddy Park gets a specific mention in the plan’s open space land inventory. The park has a history as managed forest land and the plan notes the park as having a significant wooded area. The plan also lists the park’s attributes and characteristics that merit conservation and protection including its shoreline, view points, trails, and passive recreational value.

Recently, the wooded areas of Leddy Park have received the attention of the Burlington Conservation Legacy Program whose mission is to manage and coordinate the protection and enhancement of significant natural areas, and other important conservation lands with the city.  The CLP’s interest at Leddy has focused on combating non-native invasive species threats in the park and has removed Japanese Knotweed in the park’s south end.

The city of Burlington should be commended for formally recognizing the value of open space preservation, for recognizing Leddy Park’s open space characteristics, and for its conservation efforts in the park.

With that said, I was surprised and deeply concerned upon learning of the Parks & Recreation Commission decision to site an 18 hole disc golf course throughout most of the remaining wooded areas in Leddy Park. This is a misguided decision that is out of step with the city’s Open Space Protection Plan and antagonistic to conservation efforts.

Disc golf will destroy the natural wild character of this open space by clearing large fairways throughout the remaining forest, and will degrade the tranquility and quality of the natural setting by subjecting it to the traffic and impacts of intensive use. Numerous stories from other communities, some recounted on LeddyPark.org, tell of the environmental impacts suffered on disc golf courses sited in inappropriate natural areas.  Courses have been shutdown and relocated because of the damages caused.

The Chittenden County Forester indicated in a recent report that development of a disc golf course in Leddy Park is not consistent with long-term forest health.  He also indicated that the removal of understory during fairway clearing significantly alters the existing vegetation and with heavy foot traffic these areas become susceptible to a variety of problems associated with soil disturbance, including compaction, root and plant death and the spread of non-native invasive species.

The Parks & Recreation Commission’s decision should be reversed. Disc golf may be a fun game and its enthusiasts are deserving of a place to play in the greater Burlington area but disc golf is simply not an appropriate activity for the woodlands of Leddy Park.   These treasured natural areas of the park represent open space used for passive recreational activities by city residents and have so for decades.

Our city has embraced the practice of open space preservation, has recognized those characteristics meriting preservation in Leddy Park, and has an active conservation effort in the park.  Building a disc golf course will displace current passive recreational uses and will adversely transform valuable city open space.  It is an action that violates the spirit and intention of the Open Space Protection Plan.

Mark Barlow – Burlington

Disc Golf and Safety at Leddy Park

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

Disc golf itself appears to be a relatively safe sport.  There are no published statistics on disc golf injuries; however, it only takes about 30 minutes of looking on the Internet to locate newspaper articles, research papers, comments and blogs that identify numerous instances of by-standers or non-players being injured by thrown discs.  Attached to this  statement are copies of articles, websites, URL’s, etc.  that identify a sample of these incidents.  From these sources it is very apparent that bystanders, non-participants and other park users have been subjected to very serious injuries,e.g. broken bones, damaged teeth and lacerations that have required stitches.  It doesn’t appear that these types of injuries are common, but they do occur, especially in multi-use parks or where disc golf courses are located close to  places where people walk and/or ride bikes. These articles also identify more than one case where disc golf courses have been relocated in order to protect non-participants and to reduce the liability exposure of the entity sponsoring the disc golf course.

#1  Disc Golf in multi-use parks can cause serious injuries to non-players

This brings me to the issues of course design, setbacks from adjacent property and buffer zones between course fairways and walking/bike path for the course proposed at Leddy.  At the Sept 3d public meeting it was reported that the proposed course has been designed to allow for 75 foot setbacks from property lines and 25 foot buffer zones from walking and bike paths-including the Burlington Bike Path.  A review of the course design standards at the Professional Disc Golf Association’s  (PDGA) website (http://www.pdga.com/course-development) shows very detailed and specific information about things such as tee to hole distance,  type of  terrain, density of trees/vegetation, etc.  for determining the par for individual holes and the difficulty level of the course.  The standards, however, do not provide similarly detailed information to ensure the safety of non-players.  Rather, there are general statements to be aware of other park users when designing a new course, but there is no specific information about minimum distances for setbacks and buffer zones from other park uses to ensure the safety of non-participants.  From the perspective of corporate liability,  I can understand why the Professional Disc Golf Association does not provide specific information about how to ensure the safety of non-players.  Given this lack of prescriptive standards  to ensure the safety of non-players, the proposed 75 foot setbacks from property lines and 25 foot buffer zones between fairways and existing paths and other Park activities, appear to be arbitrary or subjective values developed to fit the proposed course within the available space, rather than to ensure the safety of other Park users.

#2  The Professional Disc Golf Association’s Standards for course design do not provide specific information or requirements to ensure the safety of non-players

Given that disc golf can be hazardous to non-players and that the PDGA course design standards do not provide any specific standards for ensuring the safety of non-players, it is essential that the Working Group make recommendations to the Parks and Recreation Commission about changes to the course design that will reduce the potential for injuries to non-players and also reduce the City’s exposure to liability claims.  At a minimum the Working Group should recommend that property setbacks and buffer zones between fairways and walking paths be increased to at least 150 feet and 75 feet respectively, with additional distance where vegetation is thin.  Or, as suggested by some disc golfers on the PDGA’s Discussion website, http://discussion.pdga.com/msgboard/postlist.php?Cat=0&Board=CourseDesign, recommend that the disc golf course be located in a disc golf-only location.

#3  The Working Group should recommend that  the property setback and buffer zones distances at Leddy be increased, or locate the course in a disc-golf only location.

Ron McGarvey